Nature recommend reviewer
WebWhen revising your manuscript and responding to peer review comments: Describe the revisions to your manuscript in your response letter. Perform any additional experiments or analyses the reviewers recommend (unless you feel that they would not make your paper better; if this is the case, explain why in your response letter) Provide a polite ... WebThe following types of contribution to Nature Portfolio journals are peer-reviewed: Articles, Letters, Brief Communications, Matters Arising, Technical Reports, Analysis, Resources, …
Nature recommend reviewer
Did you know?
WebReviewer Finder is an exciting tool that reduces the manual work involved in finding relevant reviewers. To use the tool, simply enter information about the manuscript you … WebAJE is proud to offer three new services from our partners at Nature Research Editing Service. These services are designed to provide top-quality developmental editing and advice on manuscripts and grant applications in the natural sciences (medicine, biology, chemistry, physics, and earth sciences) and engineering.
WebRecognition through the Web of Science Reviewer Recognition Service (previously branded as Publons) This free service records, verifies, and showcases peer review contributions, which can be used in promotion …
WebMinor revisions required： The authors are required to make moderate changes to their manuscript. The manuscript becomes acceptable for publication if the changes proposed by the reviewers and editors are successfully addressed. The revised manuscript will be sent back to all (or a selection of) reviewers for a second round of reviews. Web8 de abr. de 2024 · Nature Communications thanks Tobias Ritschel and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available. Additional information
WebFocus on Peer Review is a free online training course from Nature Masterclasses, delivered by Nature Research journal editors. It contains 1-5 minute videos offering insightful …
WebFinding Peer Reviewers: Solutions for Identifying and Securing Potential Candidates Criteria for a suitable reviewer Active in the relevant field and/or methodology as judged by their publication record Ideally having published more than 10 articles in the past 10 years Not too senior, as they are likely to be very busy datafono preciosWebThen, write a letter that explains why the editor would want to publish your manuscript. The following structure covers all the necessary points that need to be included. If known, address the editor who will be assessing your manuscript by their name. Include the date of submission and the journal you are submitting to. martha argerich liszt piano concertoWebI would recommend the rejection of a manuscript based on the following: 1. The work lacks scientific merit - the manuscript does not make any significant improvement to the intended field of ... datafono ingenico move 5000WebMotivation: We specifically ask the reviewer not to consider someone as reviewer, as our findings are highly critical of that person's work. Yet reviewer 1 was clearly that person … datafono ingenico apos a8Web1. The amount and nature of the demands of the police service A.Clientele B.Purpose C.Time D. Process Answer: C 2. The PNP has a program which ensures the deployment of policemen in busy and crime prone areas. This is called A. patrol deployment program B. roving patrol program C. patrol and visibility program D. police patrol program Answer: C 3. martha atienza 1981-presentWeb话说回来，major revision该不该高兴呢？. 先高兴一下吧，这是科研中少有的一些些可以高兴的时刻（毕竟没有被拒），以后的曲折就先放一边吧，因为以后的曲折还多着呢！. 这个 … martha atienza biographyWebPeer reviewer selection is critical to the publication process. It is based on many factors, including expertise, reputation, specific recommendations, conflict of interest and … martha azizi modesto ca